Speech at the Council of Lawmakers meeting
President of Russia Vladimir Putin: Good afternoon, colleagues.
… if anyone intends to intervene from the outside and create a strategic threat to Russia that is unacceptable to us, they should know that our retaliatory strikes will be lightning-fast. We have the tools we need for this, the likes of which no one else can claim at this point. We will not just brag; we will use them if necessary. And I want everyone to know this; we have made all the decisions on this matter.I would like to welcome all of you to our traditional meeting. I would like to congratulate you on the Day of Russian Parliamentarism, you and your colleagues, senators and deputies at all levels, legislative body staff and, of course, veteran MPs.
In May, the Council of Lawmakers will be 10 years old. We have all seen for ourselves that this format is useful and essential. As it coordinates the drafting of laws, following the principles of federalism, the Council facilitates the balanced development of our country. It reflects the diversity and wealth of our regions, our territories.
Your work is based on a constructive public dialogue. Such an open, specific exchange of opinions is certainly raising the Council’s responsibility before the people and society for every promise, initiative and proposal. If we make a public statement, it should not just be left hanging with the public waiting while nothing happens. We should never allow this.
I would like to emphasise, in this context, that the amendments to the Constitution adopted in 2020 have not only strengthened the position and influence of our parliament – and it is perfectly obvious that we have strengthened our parliamentarism – but they have also created conditions for further developing Russia’s independent, sovereign legislation and national jurisdiction without lectures and interference from any outside force. It is the people and the people alone that are the source of power in our country.
Its representatives – the parliamentary parties – for all the competition between them, are invariably acting from the same position when it comes to fundamental national interests and the resolution of our Fatherland’s defense and security issues.
This kind of patriotic attitude is clear and inherent in our people, always supported by the majority, the overwhelming majority of Russians. Every election and all public opinion polls have confirmed this, and this cannot be otherwise anyway because love for the Motherland is one of the key foundations of Russian statehood and the most important value for our society, which invariably manifests itself at critical times for the country.
Such unity of the people is a great value and a guarantee that Russia will be able to stand up to the most complex challenges and threats, and will confidently go through any trial. This has always been so, and so it will be now.
In this regard, I would like to emphasise again: all the goals of the special military operation launched on February 24 will definitely be attained in order to guarantee peace and security for the residents of the Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics, of Russian Crimea, and our entire country in a historical perspective.
We must be aware and confident that our soldiers and officers have averted a real danger posed to our Motherland. Their courage, determination, and heroism have prevented a larger conflict that would have unfolded on our territory, but following someone else’s scenarios.
The forces that have always pursued a policy of containing Russia – historically indeed, they did so in ancient times, and you know very well why they did this – they do not want such a huge and independent country that is too big for their ideas. They believe it endangers them simply by the fact of its existence. Although this is far from reality; it is they who endanger the world.
We have not forgotten the barbarous plans of the Nazis for the Soviet people – to drive them out. You remember, don’t you? They wanted to force those who could work to work like slaves, do slave labour in bondage. Those who were not wanted were supposed to be sent beyond the Urals or to the North to extinction. All this was recorded in documents, in historical documents. We remember this.
We also remember how the Western states encouraged terrorists and criminals in the North Caucasus in the early 1990s and 2000s, how they exploited the problems of our past, real problems, injustices of the past as regards entire peoples, including the peoples of the Caucasus. But they did all this not to make us better, not at all. They did all this to bring the problems of the past to us today, to encourage separatist attitudes in our country and eventually to split and destroy it. This is why they did all this. They wanted to drive us into the backwoods. Many have tried to do the same to Russia throughout all eras.
They did not reach their goal but could not accept their failure, that we managed to hold out against this onslaught at the time. This is why they later launched large-scale preparations for an economic war against Russia, using any excuse, and sometimes without any excuse at all, to impose more and more sanctions on us; but today’s plans to strangle us economically have also fallen through.
In addition, our enemies have been expediting the development of new “geopolitical weapons.” These weapons are basically nothing new, but they obviously gave them new motivation and a new impetus. They placed their bets on Russophobia and neo-Nazis and were impudently, unceremoniously turning our neighbor Ukraine into an “anti-Russia” year after year.
I would like to recall that when Russia had a benevolent, I would say, a friendly, comradely, fraternal attitude to the creation of an independent Ukrainian state, we thought, of course, that it would be a friendly state, that we could go further together, strengthening and developing each other and creating the most competitive conditions for progress – yes, in new and historical conditions. No one could imagine the creation of an “anti-Russia” on historical Russian territory. We simply cannot allow this to happen, and so it all comes down to a conflict, a direct conflict. Ukraine was pushed into direct confrontation with Russia, our country. Let me remind you that this was, unfortunately, all laid out, including an armed attack on Crimea and Donbass, in Ukraine’s doctrinal documents of today, while at the same time, the Ukrainian people were allotted the destiny of “expendable material.” I believe a large part of the Ukrainian people are coming to realise this.
The entire course of recent events, including the Kiev regime’s claims to possess nuclear weapons, the deployment of a network of Western biolabs on Ukrainian territory, the seamless supplies of cutting-edge weapons to Ukraine, has confirmed that our reaction to those cynical plans was correct and timely.
Colleagues,
I would like to emphasise once again that our soldiers and officers, and the Donbass militia are heroically doing their duty, and as I said, all their goals and objectives will be met.
But I would also like to note something I spoke about at the beginning of the special military operation. Let me emphasise once again: if anyone intends to intervene from the outside and create a strategic threat to Russia that is unacceptable to us, they should know that our retaliatory strikes will be lightning-fast. We have the tools we need for this, the likes of which no one else can claim at this point. We will not just brag; we will use them if necessary. And I want everyone to know this; we have made all the decisions on this matter.
Colleagues,
I would like to thank all the parties in the State Duma and the Federation Council for their firmness, solidarity and support, for ensuring the high pace and quality of lawmaking in close cooperation with the Government of the Russian Federation. I hope the regional legislators will work just as intensively and will just as quickly coordinate their activities with the regional executive authorities.
I am referring to the many packages of anti-sanction measures adopted in the past two months, dozens of important laws and by-laws, which have already passed through the local legislatures and through Russian parliament.
I would like to note that specific decisions will be made in the near future on the indexation of pensions and all social benefits, as well as the salaries of specialists employed in the public sector. To ensure practical implementation of this policy, I ask the parliamentarians to carefully work out the necessary amendments and legal mechanisms.
These and the other decisions we have been making are aimed at providing direct assistance to the most vulnerable categories of the population – families with children and senior citizens. The key industries, strategic enterprises, small and medium-sized businesses are also receiving and will continue to receive support. As a result, by taking the measures I have just mentioned, we have not just softened, but, as I said, we have repelled, blocked the very first crushing blow – as the West believed it to be – of the illegitimate sanctions against our country.
Our banking system, national currency, transport, trade, and the economy in general have withstood the shock and have not crumbled. On the contrary, they now have good resources for development, for the launch of new projects in infrastructure and industry, and for developing and unlocking the potential of all our regions. Undoubtedly, this is the result of a balanced and responsible socioeconomic policy over the recent years, the implementation of our national projects, and the result of your, my colleagues, concerted and energetic efforts amid today’s extraordinary circumstances.
I want you to partner with the ministries and departments, governors’ teams, as I mentioned earlier, and the business, scientific and expert communities in order to continue to develop new, effective and well-thought-out anti-crisis measures, to strengthen parliamentary control from within over the implementation of decisions, and to support our people.
It is important to ensure not only stability in the economy, the domestic market, and the regular operation of industrial enterprises, but to strengthen our country’s industrial and technological sovereignty and even global leadership in certain areas. This is an absolutely feasible task in areas where we have the required scientific expertise, engineering schools and production base, and we do have that in our country.
How many aircraft did we make before? Carrier companies were happy with buying foreign-made equipment which, indeed, boasts advantages in terms of noise levels and fuel consumption, but our manufacturers should strive to achieve these standards. However, they could hardly overcome this challenge in a situation where the domestic market was flooded with foreign manufacturers; that is the problem. And it is so with most products. However, wherever possible, wherever, to reiterate, we have advanced schools, engineers and readily available potential, this potential needs to be developed. We have many such areas. Many areas of production, and high-tech production at that, see good, new and modern opportunities opening up.
As I have said, we will counter any crude and often inept external restrictions, the destruction of all civilised rights and agreements and attempts to isolate us with greater freedom of entrepreneurship, openness to honest partnerships, respect and reliable protection of owners and genuine investors. All these goals require the direct involvement of the deputies at the federal and regional levels alike.
I would like to ask you personally to work directly with the heads of municipalities and companies, businesses, NGOs and work teams to help them resolve their problems and eventually grant them additional systemic support measures. I would like to add that United Russia bears special responsibility for this as the leading party. But I am addressing all parliamentary parties now – I am asking you to work together.
In general, I would like to ask you to have direct contact with the people. It is no longer important now, not significant whose voters they are and whether any of them voted at all. It is important to devote time and attention to all these people, to respond if you are asked for help and protection. Sometimes people are just asking for advice and it is necessary to respond to this, too.
And there is one more important task for those who work in committees on international affairs or friendship groups with their foreign counterparts. I understand that it has become impossible and also pointless to work in some associations, for example, PACE. In general, many of these formats were established in the early 1990s not to harmonise relations in Europe but to influence the post-Soviet space. We understand this. But these instruments have become obsolete. Nobody needs them anymore. Let them deal with their own issues; let them campaign for higher wages and resolution to their mounting problems. We will not spend time talking about them here. This applies to human rights and women’s rights or, say, women’s inequality in the workplace. Europe and the States have many problems like this, so let them deal with their own problems.
But at this time, we need to use any accessible format or channel for parliamentary diplomacy in Europe, Asia, Africa and America, as much as we can – those that have remained. Direct contact can never hurt because we have many supporters in all global regions, I assure you, although you know this yourselves. But it is necessary to work with them to justify our position with arguments, to uphold the truth and to bring information to the people who want to know it, true information.
Speaking at a Prosecutor General’s Office Board meeting the day before yesterday, I mentioned the need to create a detailed and incontrovertible evidence base covering all the heinous crimes and violations of international humanitarian law committed by the neo-Nazis and foreign mercenaries who are arriving in Ukraine in great numbers. The other day, several of them were destroyed, and several others were detained. The Defence Ministry will present them to the public soon. These atrocities will certainly receive an objective legal assessment. However, it is important to raise these issues at the international level, including at the parliamentary level, even now.
I mentioned earlier Kiev’s attempt, which was prevented, to physically eliminate some of our journalists through terrorist attacks. Here is what I have to say in this regard.
Those criminals, terrorists have been neutralised and detained and their actions are being investigated. But it is no secret that such methods – killing their own journalists and politicians right on the street – have been used quite often in Ukraine in recent years. Now, they decided to take this practice to our country.
No doubt, we will do our best to protect the people who work at official Russian television and radio channels, the people who work online and promote patriotism, people who make up the vast majority of our country’s media space. But we must be aware that such a threat exists. Of course, we cannot assign guards from the FSO, the FSB or the National Guard to everyone, but we will do and must do our best to ensure their safety.
Here is what I would like to say, and what I am absolutely sure of. Any attempts to intimidate the people who work in the media space, to intimidate Russian journalists who have a patriotic position, are doomed. On the contrary, I do not doubt for a single second that these attempts will result in even more people joining their ranks to show that we have people who are not afraid of anything and who are ready to and will uphold our country’s interests.
Colleagues,
There are a quite a few pressing items on your agenda. I wish you luck and every success in your future work. I congratulate everyone on our upcoming great, main holiday – the Day of the Great Victory. I am sure that uncompromising will, courage and loyalty to the Fatherland will always inspire you and all of us.
Thank you very much for your attention.
I wish you all the best. Thank you.
Undoubtedly, a great leader for a great country. That’s why we see people every day expressing the opinion that they would like this to be the president of their own country.
I agree!!!
Absolutely. Once you stop listening to the media and start looking at his speeches and achievements it is clear as to what a great leader he is.
The citizens of the west have been both conned and forced to reward the lowest common denominator and ignore the high integrity achievers. Probably by design. Any country and population that wants prosperity need to strive for the opposite action.
Liberalism is about liberating the lowest instincts and preventing creative thinking.
And what type of threat would trigger such an immediate and long overdue response from Russia, I wonder?
It is difficult to understand the mindset of the Russian, enduring empathy is both its strength and weakness.
I would have turned the gas spigots off sooner. Maybe I am just a byproduct of the current era and want to end the madness from the west immediately. Partners be damed!
Russia is losing! Why, only the other day it lost a tank and I don’t remember what else.
The bad news for the freedom-loving, brave Ukie fighters and their foreign advisors is that the more Russia is losing, the more it advances. Somehow.
On the economic front the good news is that sanctions against Russia are working: while the economies of the EU countries are cratering and the energy-saving unwashed Europeans are soon to suffer from cold and hunger, they are undeterred in their determination to never again listen to Tchaikovsky or Rachmaninov or allow Russian athletes to participate in international competitions (they are worthless at cricket or baseball anyway). Understandably, Pres Putin hides this harsh reality when he speaks publicly. Maybe he doesn’t even know!….
https://www.zerohedge.com/military/ukraine-says-russia-increasing-pace-attack-almost-all-directions
Thank you for the laugh!
Patience of Russia with the Imperialist West is not all laudable, but her steadfastness at present is. Russia should have stopped the Ukraine coup right in 2014, but better late than never, though.
Russia was not ready in 2014. It would have been a disaster for them. Eight years of preparation and then they acted.
I have been reading Putin’s speeches since 2004. The man is clear and determined. Any country would benefit from the leadership of such a man.
Agreed, in 2014, not long after the great recession/depression of 2007/8, when the global economy was tanking, Russia may not have survived, or at least floundered with similar such sanctions imposed recently.
Mr Kinzhal & Associates/Systems for example were in their teething stages. Coupled with the satanic old Empire’s Syrian genocidal escapade, Russia’s economic & military resources would have been spread too thin.
He who backs off and retreats away, lives to fight another day. In the 8 years following 2014 it is truly remarkable what Putin/Russia have achieved. Everyone is listening, new doors/relationships are strengthening.
“In the 8 years following 2014 it is truly remarkable what Putin/Russia have achieved. ”
And the beauty of that is the total surprise of the “west” to these achievements, even though there were many strong hints.
Remember when RF entered Syria? The Zionist alliance were gobsmacked. They had no clue Russia would project militarily in to the ME.
One problem with being a loudmouth braggart, constantly crowing about one’s own perceived prowess, is that it takes one’s gaze off the opponent’s preparation.
Russia would also have been much more alone and isolated in executing this operation than they are now. Standing up to centuries of mischief and mayhem, I would venture to guess there might be more than a few people around the world that wouldn’t like to see the west taken down a notch or two. Iran is certainly one country that comes to mind.
Big huge shout out to Saker and the community. Best wishes to you all.
Illegal sanctions resets the table.
Good to see that Russia will no longer abide by patent laws.
They should also turn off the spigot for any country that donated weapons to the Nazis immediately.
No fertilizer grain or gas.
In the US as well as in the West in general, the Hollywood culture stands for culture. So when addressing US/NATO, this is a message they would more easily understand:
“I know what you’re thinking: “Did he fire 6 shots or only five?”
But I’ll tell you the truth, in all this excitement I lost track myself. This is a 45 Magnum that will blow your head clean off. You gotta ask yourself one question: “Do I feel lucky?”
Well, do you, punk?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38mE6ba3qj8
The same scene played out again near the end of the movie, but that time the gun was not empty.
(as someone else is now posting under the name Wayne, I will be using Wayne B)
Within this speech are a panoply of existential threats to Russia and Russians, all concocted in the fascistic minds of the West. The Ukies are simply the tools used to deliver the weapons embodied in the the threats.
Terror bombs, assassinations, drone attacks, chemical attacks, dirty bombs, nuclear bombs, biological weapons, and the perverse use of human shields, as well as targeting humans, especially Russian-speakers are some of the array presented and planned by the US, UK, NATO and Kiev fascists.
The scenario of annexing Western Ukraine that Russian spy chief Naryshkin just warned about would actually result in the largest transfer of Polish wealth since the loss of the “Kresy” after World War II. Poland’s socio-economic stability will certainly suffer and perhaps be irreparably affected by such a radical redistribution of wealth to the millions of refugees within its territory and those folks living in Western Ukraine who’ll be the recipients of these astronomically large investments.
Lenin’s unnatural mini-empire is on the verge of what might soon be its complete and final collapse if Russian spy chief Naryshkin’s report about Poland’s plot to partition it is correct. According to his country’s intelligence sources, Poland is conspiring with the US to dispatch its troops under the cover of peacekeepers to the portions of Western Ukraine that used to be under Warsaw’s control during the interwar Second Polish Republic. They’ll then seize control of strategic facilities from the Ukrainian National Guard, after which Poland will cultivate pro-Polish Ukrainian politicians to counteract the Neo-Nazis that historically originated from the Galicia region. The last step will then be to politically incorporate this territory into Poland itself.
I actually predicted exactly this scenario two days after the commencement of Russia’s ongoing special military operation in Ukraine, having written that “NATO might want to draw its own red line in the remnants of the increasingly crumbling Ukrainian state by reviving the West Ukrainian People’s Republic, whether as a self-declared independent state that immediately joins the military alliance in order to come under its nuclear umbrella or by having it (re-)’unify’ with Poland and achieving the same end via those means instead.” That sequence of events appears on the cusp of happening according to Naryshkin, who said that it would be undertaken without a NATO mandate and comprise a so-called coalition of the willing.
Prospective partners might be Hungary and Romania, both of which had parts of their historical territory amputated from their state by Stalin after World War II. Irrespective of their speculative participation in this reported partition plot, any tangible move in this direction by Poland would indicate that the US-led West believes that Ukrainian statehood has gone kaput as a result of recent events. This state’s artificially created borders can no longer be held together after Russian forces swept across Eastern and Southern Ukraine, where they’ve remained for over 60 days despite NATO’s proxy war on Russia through Ukraine that Secretary of Defense Austin all but officially admitted to just the other day.
While there are certainly some ultra-nationalists in Poland who’d like to see Western Ukraine (re)-“united” with their country, this scenario actually entails considerable economic and reputational costs for the ruling “Law & Justice” (PiS per its Polish abbreviation) party. As I explained earlier in the month, PiS is actually a fake conservative-nationalist movement that’s really just another liberal-globalist front for the European elite. In particular, “Orban’s Conservative-Multipolar Example Exposes Kaczynski As A Liberal-Globalist Fraud”, especially after “Poland’s Ukrainization Put The Final Nail In PiS’ Faux Nationalist Project”.
Poles have become second-class citizens in their own country while Ukrainian refugees are paraded around as first-class citizens. They’re so privileged that they receive a vast array of state benefits, including housing, transportation, food, and even priority for emergency medical operations above local Poles who’ve waited a while to receive such life-saving treatments. In a sense, Poland has abruptly become an apartheid-like society where the new arrivals have been treated by officials even better than the same people who voted them into power. As I explained just prior to the Ukrainian Conflict’s onset, “Poland’s Planned Absorption Of Millions Of Ukrainian Refugees Has Ulterior Motives”.
Basically, Kaczynski calculated that he could leverage this massive expat community of privileged people in order to exert influence over the rest of rump Ukraine as part of Poland’s plans to expand its “sphere of influence” across the “Three Seas Initiative” (3SI) states on an openly Russophobic pretext that resembles a new strain of fascism. The problem, however, is that his base doesn’t support becoming second-class citizens in their own country. They voted for PiS partially because of its previously strident defense of Polish borders against the thousands of people who’ve attempted to invade their country, not to have it open the gates to millions of Ukrainian refugees who’ve since become “privileged guests”.
Apart from the counterproductive domestic political consequences of Poland’s reported plot to annex Western Ukraine, there’s also the obvious economic ones too. Depending on how much territory is taken, upwards of 10 million people might be added to Poland’s population on top of the over 3 million refugees that it’s already hosting. Not even counting the costs of ensuring those people’s general welfare, Ukraine is generally considered to be a lot poorer and less developed in all respects than Poland, including its Western region that’s regarded as a lot better than its other parts. The costs of incorporating this territory and its people into Poland could be billions upon billions of dollars.
Up until this point, Poland was the best-performing Central & Eastern European (CEE) economy though it’s now experiencing its highest inflation in over two decades. Furthermore, its refusal to comply with President Putin’s geo-economic judo move demanding payment for gas in rubles is directly responsible for Europe’s worst-case economic scenario that’ll in all likelihood lead to a further increase of prices, more unemployment, and consequently more political instability. All costs connected to Western Ukraine’s potential annexation to Poland will be paid by Polish taxpayer and occur at the expense of developing the people and territory within its universally recognized borders.
With this observation in mind, the scenario of annexing Western Ukraine would actually result in the largest transfer of Polish wealth since the loss of the “Kresy” after World War II. Poland’s socio-economic stability will certainly suffer and perhaps be irreparably affected by such a radical redistribution of wealth to the millions of refugees within its territory and those folks living in Western Ukraine who’ll be the recipients of these astronomically large investments. That predictably being the case and considering everything else that was shared in this analysis, it’s contrary to Poland’s objective national interests to annex that chunk of Lenin’s unnatural mini-empire though it might still happen regardless.
I don’t like this analyst too much usually but he is spot on on this which means WWIII
https://oneworld.press/?module=articles&action=view&id=2797
@WarIsOn: “Up until this point, Poland was the best-performing Central & Eastern European (CEE) economy though it’s now experiencing its highest inflation in over two decades.”
Just as I expected, when Poland got all those EU Loans years ago, and media began to headline how flush with money was the country.
Same historic political wisdom as Poland shows by refusing to pay for cheap Russian gas in rubles; they pay for expensive U$ gas in U$Dollars. Or they pay in euro for expensive Russian gas from Germany (which Germany has bought cheap from Russia in rubles, and re-exports to Poland via reverse-flow of Nordstream 1.)
I used to think all those old Polish jokes were libel, but really: How many Poles does it take to turn on a gas tap?
Look what ruthless, reckless Russia did to us by forcing us to place sanctions on it
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=63057
Yes, the Russians have always been unscrupulous like that. Not very nice of them to force all of those ‘allies’ to follow their ‘exceptional’ leadership into such suicide pact behavior. In the circumstances, one wonders if any military spending at all is really necessary, but at least Russia keeps their arms development and production costs relatively low. And some such backup plan is probably a good idea, if only to help motivate other MIC-driven populations into self-inflicted starvation and freezing in the dark — a fate they richly deserve for their utter stupidity.
What Pres. Putin may not know yet:
Poland’s plan to enter western Ukraine as peace keepers is not given its due importance by Russia, I am afraid. Perhaps the most recent leaks will grab the attention of Pres. Putin. According to intercepted transcripts, Polish generals are about to introduce a new tactic meant to assure victory in their plan to capture Lvov, one that has served the Poles well throughout their history every time: mounted cavalry!
The horses being assembled (many donated by the hyppodromes of various EU countries) have the advantage of maintenance without the need of high technical expertise that advance weaponry demands. The Aqueduct in NYC and Churchill Downs in Louisville, KY have each pledged six of their finest steeds that will in time sire a large cohort of fighting horses. Horses are not hampered by the absence of bridges (so many destroyed recently) because they can ford rivers, and best of all they can enter undetected by the radar. The nationalist Ukies who harbor old resentments and bad memories of the Polish landlords in Lemberg will be stunned into paralysis by the terror of the blood-curdling neighing. The enemies of my enemies are also my enemies, will be their last bewildering thought. But what will Russia do? We’ll find out soon…
The mounted cavalry (men with swords) will be followed by a supply caravan of oxcarts full of cannons and muskets (and water and oats). Russian troops will be repelled merely by the odor of the animals’ excrement.
Yes it’s very difficult to fire off a manpad on horseback although I once saw some horsemen riding upside down at the circus.
As the saying goes, don’t bring a horse to a tank fight.
From the lips of President Putin himself:
“Colleagues,
I would like to emphasise [sic] once again that our soldiers and officers, and the Donbass militia are heroically doing their duty, and as I said, all their goals and objectives will be met.
But I would also like to note something I spoke about at the beginning of the special military operation. Let me emphasise [sic] once again: if anyone intends to intervene from the outside and create a strategic threat to Russia that is unacceptable to us, they should know that our retaliatory strikes will be lightning-fast. We have the tools we need for this, the likes of which no one else can claim at this point. We will not just brag; we will use them if necessary.”
See: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/68297
The “line in the sand” so to speak has been drawn, the talk has been given and now it is time to put words into action.
The U.S. AWAC and UAV planes that provide on-the-ground intelligence to the AFU must be harassed by Russian Aerospace Force fighter aircraft and driven completely out of the battlespace. Use cannon fire in front of the cockpit if necessary. Buss them repeatedly like a swarm of hornets until they leave. If they are accompanied by U.S./NATO escorts and they take an air combat stance then shoot them down.
The AWAC’s are a strategic threat to the Russian Armed Forces on the ground. This is completely justified and lets the U.S. know that Russia no longer tolerates their support for Ukraine that endangers Russia’s ability to liberate Ukraine from Nazi control.
I never node there was still a degree of cooperation between Russia & Z-NATO. I thought no-fly-zone meant no-fly. Russia seemingly wouldn’t pick up the phone.
What are we saying here in layman’s terms?
President Putin articulated in his address to the Council of Lawmakers that any foreign government (e.g., U.S.A.) or military alliance (e.g., NATO) that gives direct combat assistance to the AFU to a measure that threatens the success of the Russian Federation’s ability to prosecute the liberation of Ukraine from the Nazi will be subject to retaliatory strikes.
Example: the U.S. has reconnaissance aircraft both unmanned and manned operating within an airspace that covers Ukraine. The aircraft provide intelligence imagery to the AFU that pinpoints the location of Russian ground forces. This allows the AFU to target those locations with heavy weapons artillery fire killing Russian liberators. That is the kind of strategic threat President Putin stated and that is why those aircraft must be harassed to drive them out of range of providing intelligence data, even if it means crossing into neighboring countries airspace (e.g., Romania, Moldova, Poland, etc.).
The safety of the Russian men fighting the Nazi is paramount to the SMO and if it means direct contact with the U.S./NATO so be it. It’s going to happen anyway in the long run.
On June 20th of 2019, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Air Defense Forces shot down a U.S. RQ-4A Global Hawk flying close to Iranian air space. If the Persians are not afraid of the U.S. so then must Russia do the same to protect her ground forces.
Would like to see Russia – China start new parallel organization similar to the UN, cause it looks increasingly likely that the current international organizations UN, FIFA and the International Olympic Committee etc. aren’t doing what they are suppose to be doing. Also, the US wants to annul Russia’s vetoing power. So many countries in zone B are looking forward to join the new UN led by Russia and China. This is the time to do it.
Wow! This here is a real leader of a great nation! Unlike the wests’ Circular Firing Squad of infantile toadies and psychopathic girlie men, like CanaDUH’s Justin (Sinbad the sailer), Al Jolson impersonator, Tru D’OH! I And our illustrious second in command Crystia (my grandfather was a NAZI collaborator) Freeland. You can’t make this s**t up. Have mercy on us, we’re that stupid. But NAZIlensky takes the prize for his piano/penis playing skills.
Who buys Russian oil :
Lithuania – 84%
Finland – 80%
Slovakia – 74%
Poland – 58%
Hungary -43%
Estonia -34%
Germany -30%
Norway -25%
Belgium -23%
Turkey -21%
Denmark -15%
Spain -11%
Russia reaped 62 billion euros from oil, gas, and coal since the special denazification effort began, on declining exports no less. E.U. gets 40% of its gas, 46% of its coal, and 30% of its oil from Mother Russia!!! How utterly stupid are the IIIINBREEEDERS of “the west?” PRETTY STUPID!
If the shoe was on the other foot and it was the current decaying decrepit Empire who were Energy resource rich and Russia Energy starved, a whole boatload of Russians in their millions would be dying (think about this ).
Russia would not have its factories/production centres running full-tilt or be sending tanks with back-up fuel supply logistics to thwart US-NATO’s savage neo-Nazi death squads on its borders.
These scoundrels need not only be checkmated, while the going is good, the odds favourable, Russia must, I say must, squeeze ’em ’till their pips squeak. Do not allow any regrouping, disable them completely. Not so difficult as we here in Europe are on life-support and deserving of a good kicking for licking America’s overly salty scrotum.
First up, these Energy deals must include non-intervention in Ukraine.
Finland will not buy gas now….Slovakia has reversed its hysteria and will pay in rublez new mechansism…but want 63 million Euros compendation for the savrice of its s300. Swedents comp. too for the equivalent of about 65 USA dollars. Bulgarian businees wants Rus gas back.
Sooooo….will oil supplies have to be payed for rubles too by unfriendly countries…. is that a risk too far????????? Maybe Rus. has already lined up alternative customers but are there sufficent pipelines for redirection one wonders.
What a speech…
“I would like to emphasise, in this context, that the amendments to the Constitution adopted in 2020 have not only strengthened the position and influence of our parliament – and it is perfectly obvious that we have strengthened our parliamentarism – […] It is the people and the people alone that are the source of power in our country.”
It is noticeable from even the other side of the world that the role of parliament is bigger since then, so it comes as no surprise to read it. Careful with that, though (chuckle). Putin should read the “Farewell Address” of George Washington. Nobody paid attention to it. It should have been read in Congress every year. That last sentence of the quote is true, and usually true everywhere in some way or other, and that’s why it’s wrong to insult the president of a country. They insult him as if he were separate from his people, but that’s only in their own imagination, and his people are offended by their insult(s) too. Any fool should know it.
“Such unity of the people is a great value and a guarantee that Russia will be able to stand up to the most complex challenges and threats, and will confidently go through any trial.”
Noticeable too. They are perhaps the most united country in the world and that is a great asset that, of course, they must protect and preserve.
“In this regard, I would like to emphasise again: all the goals of the special military operation launched on February 24 will definitely be attained in order to guarantee peace and security for the residents of the Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics, of Russian Crimea, and our entire country in a historical perspective.”
All right, ye interpreters, you can interpret what does “in a historical perspective” mean there. I don’t want to interpret it. It’s important, though. :)
So here it is:
“But I would also like to note something I spoke about at the beginning of the special military operation. Let me emphasise once again: if anyone intends to intervene from the outside and create a strategic threat to Russia that is unacceptable to us, they should know that our retaliatory strikes will be lightning-fast. We have the tools we need for this, the likes of which no one else can claim at this point. We will not just brag; we will use them if necessary. And I want everyone to know this; we have made all the decisions on this matter.”
It’s very good that Western media picked up this quote and amplified it.
What important words he says in the rest of the speech too. Methinks all governments and politicians should read this speech.
I’m sure Putin’s speeches are plagiarised more than any other Leader since De Gaulle. I can see the Euro-wimps standing in their bathrooms, looking into their mirrors and reciting Putin’s speeches with their butt-plugs inserted to the max.
“They placed their bets on Russophobia and neo-Nazis and were impudently, unceremoniously turning our neighbor Ukraine into an “anti-Russia” year after year.”
Sometimes the dictionary definition is better than the word. The google definition of “impudently”: Offensively bold or disrespectful; insolent or impertinent.
I said Putin should read the farewell address of George Washington. Here’s part of Washington’s message against political parties in his farewell address of 1796 (later shown to be so true that it makes his words look prophetic):
“I have already intimated to you the danger of Parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on Geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, & warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the Spirit of Party, generally.”
Later: “… the common & continual mischiefs of the spirit of Party are sufficient to make it the interest and the duty of a wise People to discourage and restrain it. It serves always to distract the Public Councils and enfeeble the Public Administration. It agitates the Community with ill founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot & insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence & corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.”
I feel nothing but the utmost respect, admiration and gratitude towards President Putin. He has shown himself over the last two decades to be a great leader and a hard-working, honest and patriotic public servant.
Twenty-two years ago in his first inauguration speech, he said he saw his main task as president as “to take care of Russia”. He said he expected his comrades-in-arms and colleagues, “all those who hold dear the destiny of their fatherland”, to fulfil this patriotic duty as well. He said he was convinced that those who voted for other candidates also voted “for our common future, for our common goals, for a better life, for a flourishing and strong Russia.”
He said that that day, May 7, 2000, was a truly historic day, because “for the first time in the entire history of our state, for the first time in Russian history, supreme power in the country is handed over in the most democratic and most simple way: through the will of the people – legally and peacefully.” He said that the “peaceful succession of power” was the crucial element of the political stability Russians had been dreaming of and aspiring to. He said that Russians must safeguard what has been achieved, maintain and develop democracy, and ensure that elected authorities worked in the people’s interests, served society, and defended Russian citizens everywhere.
He talked about the importance of knowing Russia’s history as it really is, drawing lessons from it and always remembering those who created the Russian state and made it a great and mighty state. He told Russian citizens that he heard them, listened to them and regarded their words as important, believed in them, and counted on them. He assured them that in his work he would be guided only by the interests of the state, and he promised that, although there would be mistakes, he would work openly and honestly.
He said, “We want our Russia to be a free, prosperous, rich, strong and civilized country, a country of which its citizens are proud and which is respected in the world.” And he concluded by saying that he considered it his sacred duty “to unite the people of Russia”, always remembering that “that we are one nation and we are one people. We have one common destiny.”
Now we see that President Putin has been true to his word and remains committed to every ideal expressed in his first inauguration speech. Russia is fortunate to have such an honourable, determined, caring and wise leader, and very fortunate that he came to power at the point in its history when he did. I wish luck, success and health to President Putin, his colleagues in the Russian Government, and all Russians, and I look forward to visiting Russia again as soon as possible.
I saw a Deutsche Welle documentary which said that income or real wages had increased tenfold under Putin. Nowhere else have I heard such an information, but it is what explains his popularity in Russia. If people are that much better off than 22 years ago, that’s the main reason why he is so popular there.
Great speech and great rallying call by VV Putin. And as usual, always informed by history. It is always instructive to study speeches made by VVP and the Russian leadership.
In the context of the great power competition that is presently unfolding in the military domain in the Ukraine, and in the economic and diplomatic domains, it is a speech made by a leader who is convinced of the righteousness of his country’s actions and who has unshakeable belief that his people will be able to bear the burden of this contest and will ultimately prevail.
His stark warning to Russia’s enemies that ‘if anyone intends to intervene from the outside and create a strategic threat to Russia that is unacceptable to us, they should know that our retaliatory strikes will be lightning-fast. We have the tools we need for this, the likes of which no one else can claim at this point. We will not just brag; we will use them if necessary. And I want everyone to know this; we have made all the decisions on this matter’ is, as implied in the pulled quote, of utmost significance particularly the part where VVP says all decisions have been made.
The whole world understands what the statement means — a possible break out of general war. It will be a great pity if it may yet be lost on the idiots who run the West — a corrupt, depraved, deluded and utterly misanthropic transnational cabal and their vassals who will, contrary to their expectations, be among the first to meet their Maker in any global conflagaration. It is increasingly obvious to others that Russia has thought this through and has decided on their fates.
“But I would also like to note something I spoke about at the beginning of the special military operation.”
Putin on February 25: “I would now like to say something very important for those who may be tempted to interfere in these developments from the outside. No matter who tries to stand in our way or all the more so create threats for our country and our people, they must know that Russia will respond immediately, and the consequences will be such as you have never seen in your entire history.”
The New York Times commented about this in its transcript of the February speech, “Putin’s Case for War, Annotated”:
“This statement is widely seen as a threat of nuclear strikes against any Western country that might militarily intervene against Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.”
Putin now: “We have the tools we need for this, the likes of which no one else can claim at this point. We will not just brag; we will use them if necessary. And I want everyone to know this; we have made all the decisions on this matter.”
Biden is not fully aware of the import of the words “we have made all the decisions.” He said today, ““Instead of saying that the Ukrainians, equipped with some capability to resist Russian forces, are doing this, they’ve got to tell their people that the United States and all of NATO is engaged”.
“Biden: Idea of larger proxy war ‘not true’”
https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/live-updates-biden-idea-larger-proxy-war-true-84372409
Not only the great organisation , the success at autarky, the solidarity with the population, but even all the list of actions to overcome the sanctions imposed by the frantic and incompetent but very cruel “West” show that far from being “subhuman”!!! as Andrei Martyanov mentions in his latest contribution, the Russians are the greatest humans and humanitarians on our planet.
Joe Biden today ups the ante with another 33 milliard dollars!!! asked for in the Congress to donate to Ukraine so it can defend itself!!
Why did we all (especially the USSR and the Red Army) manage to defeat Nazism in WW2 yet today manage to allow Ukraine to be run by such leaders as have convinced the majority of the “West” by lies and propaganda that it is an independent nation, helped to thrive by the “leader of the free world” in 2022???
Just an observation on a small part of Putin’s speech which struck me…
“The entire course of recent events, including the Kiev regime’s claims to possess nuclear weapons, the deployment of a network of Western biolabs on Ukrainian territory, the seamless supplies of cutting-edge weapons to Ukraine,…”
Is this a mis-translation? To my knowledge, the Ukraine (Zelensky) did not claim to posses nuclear weapons but that the acquisition of them would be perused. Also, the statement regarding “cutting edge weapons” seems at odds with the views/analisys of many here who point out that the weaponry sent by the NATO states are mostly obsolete (besides the “Switchblade”) and ineffective. Hopefully these are indeed mis-translations as even the rather insignificant nature of those claims in a political speech (and the false nature of them), to me, taints the image of Putin as scrupulously honest. Having said that, I understand about political hyperbole, but these two falsehood seem to me glaring and unnecessary on Putin’s part, if the translation is correct.
Trying to interpret it, “cutting edge weapons” they have received recently and probably can be said of some previous deliveries; “Kiev regime’s claims to possess nuclear weapons” could be something that he knows and is revealing only partly, whether as an unfounded claim heard or as only partly true. These and/or other possible variations would have to not exist for a “falsehood” conclusion to be good. Perhaps it could have been better stated; it doesn’t matter among the many speech points, and it is secondary even in its context, where “anti-Russia” is covering larger attitudes and things.