19 December 2016, the Assembly adopted, by a vote of 70 in favor to 26 against with 77 abstentions, the draft resolution titled “Situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine)”.
The Western and Ukrainian media true to its practice to never say a word of truth reported this as “The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution on human rights in Crimea.”
There is a hope that the NATO members pushing for this resolution would abandon this issue, but when did they ever behave reasonably?
Quoting the UN transcript: “Regarding the draft on the human rights situation in Crimea, the statement delivered by Ukraine’s delegate had compelled the Russian Federation to take the floor. He expressed hope that delegates would vote against the text, demonstrate their positions in principle and focus their attention on the human rights situation in all of Ukraine, including where the Government was waging warfare with its own means.”
“References to territorial integrity in the resolution concerning Ukraine went beyond the objective of that text.” per representative of Armenia
In it’s new “resolution” the UN General Assembly names the Russian Federation as the “occupying power in Crimea.” So, twenty five years after the biggest tragedy in our history, a forced dissolution of the USSR in the Russian historical borders, we Russians are being named “the occupiers” of our own Russian land, including those Russians who live on this land. It’s very important that in this “resolution” Russians are not named even once as the population of Crimean. Also, Russians are never named as the majority of population elsewhere on the territory of the Russian Federation.
The resolution was submitted by NATO occupied Ukraine and supported by all of the NATO members.
Brief history of the resolution on Crimea:
In November 2016, Russia Withdrew from ICC, the international criminal court, after this court frivolously accused Russia of war crimes in Crimea.
At the 46th meeting, on 8 November, the representative of Ukraine, on behalf of Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Palau, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America: draft resolution, introduced a draft resolution entitled “Situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine)” (A/C.3/71/L.26). Subsequently, Albania, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Malta, Montenegro, Norway and the Republic of Moldova joined in sponsoring the draft resolution.
On 15 November, the Secretary of the Committee read out a statement of the programme budget implications of the draft resolution.
At the same meeting, a statement was made by the representative of Ukraine. Subsequently, Iceland, the Marshall Islands and New Zealand joined in sponsoring the draft resolution. [source]
On December 19th, 2016 the Assembly took up the report on the “Human rights situations and reports of special rapporteurs and representatives” (document A/71/484/Add.3), containing four draft resolutions.
“Joint statement on human rights situation in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea”
The following is some of the wording that has been used in this piece of legislature: the Referendum for re-unification with Russia called “discriminatory legislation,” demands for an “unconditional and immediate access of international and regional human rights mechanisms to the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol.” Calls for recognition of Crimea is “part of Ukraine and call upon Russia to end its occupation.”
The UN Assembly also encourage the Secretary-General in this regard to consult regularly with the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights” Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, a representative of Saudi Arabia.
The document calls on Russia to provide access to international missions and non-governmental human rights organizations that were kicked out of the Russian territory for anti-government activities in years following the 2014 anti-government putsch in Ukraine.
The resolution thinks that “the international presence is necessary in Crimea to prevent further deterioration of the situation.” The document claims “violations of the rights of the inhabitants of Crimea,” without providing specific facts and explanations.
By this UN General Assembly effort, Russians are turned into “inhabitants” of Russia. I have been looking for another UN document that would use a term “inhabitants” in relation to the country’s population, but I couldn’t find any. In political literature, the term “inhabitants” is routinely used to describe the population of the Western colonies in Africa. It seems that the UN Western coalition has specifically designated the use of derogatory politically charged term as “inhabitants” to Russian people, naming them as “inhabitants” on the territory of Russia and simultaneously its “occupiers.”
Predictably, the Russian Foreign Ministry Sergei Lavrov called this document proposed by Kiev “a useless propaganda leaflet.”
I want to beg the difference with the Mr. Lavrov. Instead of just shrugging this draft resolution off as another NATO sponsored propaganda stunt, maybe it makes sense to look into its workings and to see if Russia can use this document and other like this to bring forward the issue of the violation of the territorial integrity of the USSR, and as a consequences, to declare the EU and NATO memberships of the territories of the former Soviet Union as being under occupation.
As pertinent to the paragraph:
“Reaffirming the responsibility of States to respect international law, including the principle that all States shall refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State and from acting in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations, recalling its resolution 2625 (XXV) of 24 October 1970, in which it approved the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, and reaffirming the principles contained therein…” page 1, A/C.3/71/L.26
There are known statements made by Gorbachev and Yeltsen that indicate that if the Belavezha Accords of the dissolution of the Soviet Union wasn’t signed, the US and other NATO members threatened the Communist government with nuclear strikes.
As pertinent to the paragraph of the draft that says the following:
“Recalling its resolution 68/262 of 27 March 2014 on the territorial integrity of Ukraine, in which it affirmed its commitment to the sovereignty, political independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders, and relevant decisions of international organizations, specialized agencies and bodies within the United Nations system…”
The UN made a grave mistake by its failure to affirmed its commitment to the sovereignty, political independence, unity and territorial integrity of the USSR.
The UN has also failed to adopt a resolution condemning the dissolution of the USSR, failed to condemn the violation of the territorial integrity of the USSR, failed to affirmed its commitment to the sovereignty, political independence, unity and territorial integrity of the USSR within its internationally recognized borders at the time when parts of the USSR have been occupied by the EU and NATO.
Using A/C.3/71/L.26 as blueprint, Russia should condemn the temporary occupation of the parts of the territory of the former USSR, afterwards named Russian Federation, by the EU members and members of the aggressive military anti-Russian alliance known as NATO.
Russia should also reaffirm the non-recognition of the annexation of its territories.
Furthermore, Russia should condemn the imposition of the legal system of the European Union and the negative impact on the human rights situation of it’s territories occupied by the EU and NATO military forces.
Russia should condemn the reported serious violations and abuses committed against residents of its territories of Ukraine, Moldova, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, and Georgia, occupied by the EU and NATO, in particular extrajudicial killings, abductions, enforced disappearances, politically motivated prosecutions, discrimination, harassment, intimidation, violence, arbitrary detentions, torture and ill-treatment of detainees and their transfer from the named territories to the territory of EU and US, as well as reported abuses of other fundamental freedoms, including the freedoms of expression, religion or belief and association and the right to peaceful assembly.
Russia should expressing serious concern at the decision of the so-called European Council and other judicial entities of the occupiers, to declare the liberation movement of the Russian population on the occupied territories to be an extremist organization and to ban its activities.
The UN General Assembly has to recall the prohibition under the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 for the occupying Power to compel a protected person to serve in its armed or auxiliary forces, and for the occupied territories of Russia to become and to be a part of aggressive anti-Russian military alliance of Western country known as NATO.
Russian Federation should condemns the abuses, measures and practices of discrimination against the residents of the temporarily occupied territories of the Russian Federation, including Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, as well as Russians and persons belonging to other ethnic and religious groups, by the European Union occupation authorities.
Russia should express its outrage with the racist and Russophobic stance of the UN officials using the term “ethnic Ukrainians” that refer to an alleged existence of “Ukrainian ethnicity” that is somehow genetically different from Russian ethnicity.
Since it’s has been already genetically proven that there is no such genetic entity as “ethnic Ukrainian,” Russian authorities should demand a scientific independent evaluation of this claim and condemnation of the UN member as being racists and Nazis.
In conclusion: If there are any legal experts here, please help me to extend on my discovery. We would submit the final draft to the Russian Federation Mission to UN. Trying to think as a lawyer, I believe we have here an outline for the legal framework on declaring the dissolution of the USSR to be illegal. Next step will be demand for re-unification of territories of the Russian Federation and its people.
With this I want to remind you recent statement made by President Putin that Russia’s border is limitless, and that it doesn’t end anywhere.
The UN org News:
23 Dec 2016 the US president-elect made a promise that after his inauguration the UN will be reformed. Experts for some reason blame the UN resolution on Israel, but I think it’s because of the UN draft resolution on Crimea.
“As to the U.N., things will be different after Jan. 20th. “
As to the U.N., things will be different after Jan. 20th.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 23, 2016
My other article on matters of international judicial malpractice
Thank you for your time
Scott
What would be Trump’s biggest mistake
http://bit.ly/2i8TbdT
single line entries are discouraged poster. They contribute little to nothing to discussion.
Please either say something with some degree of substance, or dont post. Thanks. Mod PS
This was a good link. Thanks.
Brevity is okay, if all you wanted to indicate was the article.
In fact, the article contains links to other sources.
So, double thanks.
“23 Dec 2016 the US president-elect made a promise that after his inauguration the UN will be reformed. Experts for some reason blame the UN resolution on Israel, but I think it’s because of the UN draft resolution on Crimea.”
I think trump was talking about the israeli resolution. As for trumps talk of reforming the un, in pindo can, that usually translates as increasing the bullying.
In Australia we have experience such mindsets.
When the British invaded Australia they declared the continent terra nullius…land with no owner…destroying 50,000 years of possession with the stroke of a pen.
The US has since the 1950’s had some kind of joke legislation regarding captive nations….most are ethnicities within the motherland of Russia. The hypocracy stinks to the high heavens…simply consider the plight of the native north americans.
Russia should simply move into whatever territory it likes and declare it terra nullius. Simply declare whatever customary artifacts denoting title as gibberish as per the British.
Fact is though all title stems from the church…in the West and its dominions that is the Papacy. In Russia and its principalities that would be the Orthodox Patriarch.
The Pope can have Galicia. Russia takes the rest.
It’s not true that the British immediately declared NSW “terra nullius”. It evolved from the fact that most Aboriginal groups had no system of obvious land ownership. There were groups that had oral traditions that would equate with the old English “copyhold” right to land and that was eventually recognised by the High Court in Mabo but via an extremely convoluted reasoning.
The instructions to Governor Phillip in his Letters Patent were quite clear in this issue.
“You are to endeavour by every possible means to open an Intercourse with the (Savages)* Natives and to conciliate their affections, enjoining all Our Subjects to live in amity and kindness with them. And if any of Our Subjects shall wantonly destroy them, or give them any unnecessary Interruption in the exercise of their several occupations. It is our Will and Pleasure that you do cause such offenders to be brought to punishment according to the degree of the Offence. You will endeavour to procure an account of the Numbers inhabiting the Neighbourhood of the intended settlement and report your opinion to one of our Secretaries of State in what manner Our Intercourse with these people may be turned to the advantage of this country.”
*Savages is crossed out
Russia is better than Britain. Russia has more respect for other races/ethnicities
Spain did much the same in California. They sent to that far-off country their least able civil servants…who looked in the forests and on the plains and, wherever there was a place that they wanted, they could see no “savages”. That place was then unoccupied…and taken. Of course the “savages” needed to be “Christianized” – which amounted to slavery in service to the Church, so they hid whenever they saw the fellas coming. If, now,Justice were served according to the common law grave doubts would arise as to land titles in that odd country.
Interesting about the evolution in Oz….and seems similar.
If the Spanish were so good at this, why don’t they have the entire West Coast of the Americas speaking Spanish?
Or do you opposite that they’re playing the long game on that one?
The west coast was Spanish speaking, until the US took possession of it, along with the Spanish speaking Mexican territories of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado, in what was named the Mexican-American War
“Or do you opposite that they’re playing the long game on that one?”
No long game. The Hapsburg Empire is no more.
Within the 15th -19th Century Catholicism of Spain I would say that the Franciscan Friars and their missions were one of the better things the Spanish brought to the Americas. Although many with indigenous blood and mixed (mestizo) blood will argue all sides of the issue, today:
Junipero Serra: Villain or Saint???
http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2015/09/10/437598791/savior-or-villain-the-complicated-story-of-pope-francis-s-next-american-saint
Meanwhile, I am certain that here are many times (50. 100, 1000X ???) more spanish speakers on the west coast of the USA today than there were when it was just Franciscan missions here, and indians. Millions versus a few thousands. And I and many other of northern European stock are among them!
I am told that Los Angeles is the third largest Mexican city, after El Distrito Federal (Mexico City) and Guadalajara.
What the Spanish did not do was dam the Colorado River and divert fresh water to Los Angeles and Southern California. Thus they had insufficient population here to hold back the northern European stock (primarily) gringos who did the engineering that enabled the fresh water for millions from many parts of the world to live and work here:
William Mulholland and the Rise of Los Angeles
http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520234666
In Australia, we also don’t come across the way you do (i.e. with a thick Russian accent). The British did not “invade” Australia: they made the place civilised.
In the silent time there will be space fto pore on Scott’s messages and documents.
As the cafe is currently closed maybe some folks might reflect on the precious
moments in time, we are experiencing these days:
http://astromundanediary.blogspot.de/2016/12/in-anteroom-of-time-sun-and-mercury.html
http://astromundanediary.blogspot.de/2016/12/the-moment-of-lion-in-aleppo-and-mars.html
A happy Christmas to each and everyone of the Sakers community, dead poets, analyzers, contributers, the great moderators, the fabulous technicians, savvy Scott and in Florida to the one and only Saker
Mundo
The dissolution of the USSR is a very intriguing question. Russia has till now all the necessary documents available, gathered to have a comprehensive view of all what happened at that time. They have to make a decision in this sense, maybe Russia is waiting for the proper time, I don’t know, but the talks on that is going for a while, there must be something to happen in that direction, namely, to have an open inquiry on the illegality of dissolution of the USSR. That would shake the world.
It may be wise to recall that not every leader, and this includes Russian and Soviet leaders, is cut from the same cloth as Comrade President P. The idea of placing great power in a position, and not in any particular man, is fraught with danger for the future.
As to the salient points of law as discussed – generally when the history of a legalistic matter is explored by legal experts there are a significant number of arguments discovered. The author has found a pithy seam of material, and his reasoning seems sound, but, alas, also wet, soggy, as it ignores the elephant.
How so?
The argument is moot. Classically, this was explained long ago by Thucydides, who wrote: “right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.”
Many may surmise that the author is inspired by the recent Russian Campaign Victories against the Dark Forces and that he assumes that power has shifted in such a way as to permit a court to accept the arguments that the USSR continues to exist in law. It may be that he’s ahead of himself; that he may be correct, but only in the future. I think he’s given a prediction well-buttered with hope – but a prediction that’s quite probable.
Courts are often assumed to have power. This is a fiction. The bailiff has the power on his hip, not the judge.
When the “bailiff” changes then the court will follow.
Just now it looks like one bailiff is about to retire…but he wants to keep working…
I recall too that Comrade President has made public what some style an ultimatum to the West – and that these include claims for compensation. It’s before the argument that the claim is made – and it’s natural that this claim has been made in a timely manner…but how will the cost be paid?
Alaska. Ports of influence on the coasts, “concessions”…
It’s all there in the histories. New colors, old paint.
You wish, guys! Bending the law at your will, totally omitting non Russian population, occupying sovereign states and constantly threatening the world with your nukes. Try it, guys, you will be punched really hard to your sneaky noses. ;)))
Please be more specific, friend. There are many actors, States, that have these infernal gadgets, and every actor with these monstrous machines threatens all the world… So please elaborate until we can discover some tangible meaning. Otherwise nobody will care what you write.
Oh, is that so? Are you the NATO Chieftain, perchance? If not, I sincerely beg to differ with regard to your conclusions. You seem to believe that Zionazi braggadocio percolates up from the Western — MSM consuming — petty bourgeoisie when, in fact, it’s a matter of ugly, mere reactionary cant being passed down to the West’s dullards.
Unless you’ve noticed, Russia has a highly capable, intelligent leadership with a groundswell of support at home and abroad. Given what passes for the West’s current “leadership”, I have a sneaky feeling that Russia actually could get away with some conspicuously Western practices meted out against the West, and rightly so.
Counting on the UN to do anything outside of the edicts of US of A is merely wishful thinking. Recall the Resolution placing Saudi Arabia rather high on the list of coutries routinely killing children (in Yemen), subsequent threat of withdrawal of UN membership funds (some $780 million), and a rather quick removal of Saudi state by no other than the Secretary General Ban Ki Moon. It’s a useless organization quickly becoming irrelevant, good only for entertainment value, just like the US elections.
I disagree with views which have it the UN is useless and should be scrapped. Every state hand is tied to it. The first major power quitting it would be signalling imminent catastrophe. There is grave danger for the entire biome enjoying the hospitality of Earth in the short span of days before us. Every forum is valuable. Don’t let those swept along in the zeitgeist hack any of our forums. Revolution is desirable. Dissolution is death.
Take a close look at the history of the League of Nations…and the legal relationship of the League to the UN… Avoid the assumption that things are not built upon temporal foundations – but that things happen for real, and generally concealed, reasons. Things do not simply “happen”, not in politics and not in society.
I too agree, the UN has great value, and this would be diminished by States departing. The process by which USSR was removed from the League may be of interest to some… History, they say rhymes…
Dear Scott
Can you say whether this resolution is binding on Russia
What happens if it does not comply ?
Do they face UN sanctions?
These are the issues that would be helpful to understand whether more pressure will be out in Russia
Thank you
The power to enforce is with the UNSC, not the Gen. Ass.
These sorts of UN resolutions are mud slung, no more.
Even the SC resolutions require the consensus will to act.
Thus, the Israeli settlements resolution is meaningless because the US would never act against Israel for any such reason. It contains no language of actions.
The UN is going to face serious challenge from Trump. He personally knows the corruption, having been asked to bid on their building restoration work. Billions were wasted in fraud when they turned down his very low bid that did not include the possibility of siphoning massive millions to the corrupt within the Secretariat.
He will demand this settlements resolution to be reversed or he will pull the money the US pumps into the UN.
Peace-keeping will be drastically effected. UNESCO probably will be cut.
But UN management has to be cleaned out. Kofi was a corrupt leader and Ki-Moon is no less. They are pawns of the US, so it should be easy to get changes that Trump wants.
The Swamp of the UN is about to be seriously drained, if it survives the wrath of Trump.
You mention what I find crucial – he knows them all and knows the games they play.
This is perhaps more dangerous to the looser-faction than JFK was.
All those last two years I was musing about the other kind of rich and powerfull Americans
not being victim of the own DC-propaganda. Their shape might become clearer by the time.
Scott : You have found the right approach , well done . With a bit of expansion , this position hits the heart of the truth . The Ukraine was always a part of Russia . As more than one claimed it to be ” the bread basket of Russia”. My thanks to you , and all , for your wonderful media , and the very best Christmas wishes .
Scott, if you hate the Soviet Union like you are doing, why do you (AB)use it time and again for advertizing Russia, even though you want back 100 years ago and want to recreate the Tsarist Empire?
Can you let us know perhaps?
It may be a silly notion, as it’s based on correlation and the assumption of some sort of causation, but I recall that when the USSR was viable then then Soviet People were better off – but more interesting, frankly, to me, is that when the USSR was viable and running then the American People and the USA were also better off. One naturally makes the assumption that, were the USSR to revitalize, then so might the USA… One may daydream…
But also one may make logical reasoning, and ask, for example, if Comrade President were a corrupt man (if the job was filled by a corrupt man), then would the female have been elected in USA? I’d bet on it. Comrade President illustrates the contrast between a patriotic man of character, and the examples generally permitted in USA – that alone helps everyone. So already the partially revitalized Russia has helped the USA, again (they’ve done it many times in our short history). Can reasonable American logically not want Russia to restore its great union – thus benefiting all, including Americans?
There is a little problem. It’s not the USSR that is now named the Russian Federation, but the RSFSR. It was officially renamed this way by the Supreme Council of the RSFSR in late December 1991. While the organs of power of the USSR ceased to exist.
The tweet has nothing to do with the resolution about Crimea, it is 100% about Israel, Trump is not Russia’s friend he is going to try and isolate both Russia and China, first step is the same as before, exploit the differences between both, exacerbate, and then destroy the relations.
Why it is 100% about Israel? The time it was after the Israel resolution in the UNSC.
Wow, monumentally ill-informed article. Primarily morally uninformed. Russia claiming the Baltics are NATO occupied Russia is *exactly* what NATO wants. Stopped reading when author claimed that difference in ethnicity is difference in genetcs. Monumentally I’ll informed.
By destroying the USSR and its allies Gorbachev and Yeltsin unleashed German imperialism again. The EU only serves as its vehicle and disguise.
“Nazi Plans for European Union”
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/27380
In the 90s German leaders demanded more Lebensraum in the East again:
“expansion to the East”
“outwards it is essential to achieve something whereby we have failed twice before”
“Without Germany it is impossible to integrate the East European peoples.”
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=632_1323437313
“In March 1993, Bonn’s Minister of Defense at the time, Volker Ruehe, was the first to publicly declare that the war alliance should be expanded to include several East European nations, says Brill.”
http://german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/56303
Already in 2009 the EU think tank ISS announced the current war against Russia and the motives for it:
“Hard power politics – Clausewitzian influence over alienated state regimes. Some alien-
ated regimes will still exist in 2020 – the key uncertainty here being the Kremlin. If so, we will need to retain a capability to meet their deliberate challenges to our vision of the world. This will require hard military power, but also an increased focus on asymmetrical forms of destruction, notably in the cybersphere. This is of major concern to the East-
ern members of the EU, and if the ESDP is unable to provide this then they will turn to NATO or directly to the US.”
http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/What_ambitions_for_European_defence_in_2020.pdf
“The Ukraine” is an invention of German imperialists to divide and conquer Russia.
“Germans Taught Russian Prisoners of War the Idea of Ukraine”
http://tarpley.net/metaphysical-doubts-concerning-the-existence-of-modern-ukraine-a-1918-creation-of-the-german-general-staff/
“As a “means of struggle against Russia,” the “rebellion of not only Poland, but also of the Ukraine” was sought, according to the decree handed down August 11, 1914 by the Chancellor of the German Reich.[4]”
http://german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/58703
Himmler in 1940:
“In the treatment of the foreign people in the East, we must look to recognize as much as possible individual peoples, that is, in addition to the Poles and Jews, the Ukrainians, the White Russians, the Gorals, the Lemks, and the Kashubians. If there are still somewhere to be found, there are also people. I will say that we are not only most interested in dividing the population of the East into one, but, on the contrary, into as many parts and fragments as possible.”
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.ns-archiv.de/krieg/untermenschen/himmler-fremdvolk.php
Even in 2006 the German ambassador and advisor of Yushchenko Dietmar Stuedemann promoted Ukrainian nationalism:
“It is not so important in my view to answer the question whether you share the same roots with Russia from Kyivan Rus. It is more important that you have something distinctive in your traditions, customs, in the variety of your regions and in something modern, for example, when people went into the streets to fight for their prospects [during the 2004 Orange Revolution].”
https://web.archive.org/web/20060613010844/http://www.kyivpost.com/nation/24609/
I as somebody from East-Berlin sadly confirm this.
However – most of today’s Germans have no clue whatsoever.
Nobody is telling them.
The germans are that much brainwashed it is impossible for me to describe you how it really is.
So while the 2 posts about german imperialism vs. so called “Ukraine” are absolutely true, believe me that hardly anybody in Germany can combine the puzzle stones to see anything.
By not mentioning this you are triggering false assumptions.
The world isn’t that black/white.
BTW, don’t forget that Germany back then as much as now has had openly Zionist advisors and financiers.
Problem now appears to be, that Trump turns out be be on the same track, even more than Hitlery Satanton:
Trump Slams Obama “Inflammatory Statements”, Tells Israel To “Stay Strong, Jan 20 Is Fast Approaching”
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-28/trump-slams-obama-inflammatory-statements-tells-israel-jan-20-fast-approaching
Donald Trump Full Speech at AIPAC Policy Conference (3-21-16)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHmINZRwiZU
He loves “the only democracy of the middle east” and wants to attack Iran asap.
Very saddening, he cheated me, and – perhaps – you as well.
The un needs to be bulldozed into the east river ! They have been over run with all these muslim nations trying to push sharia law on ALL of us . The US and Russia need to stand together against this threat – or we’ll all fall .
There is no future for Russia with the EU and its NATO goon squad. Russia would be wise to forgo use of the word partner in describing the western countries as the EU and US have no idea what such a word really means. The genocidal masters of heaven and earth reside in the those self-centered “partners”. The best course is to lay in a long term plan of disengagement where Russia sells less and less gas and oil to the EU and US and investment by the west in Russia is discouraged with economic incentives eg to ramp up product substitution. Russia’s future is with the BRICs especially India, China and the far east. Within a few years massive amounts of gas will be delivered to China by Russia a country with the greatest gas reserves on earth. There simply isn’t enough to go all the way around and therefore friendly countries like China should receive preference. Same is true for arctic resources. This will stop the moralizing, hectoring, bullyragging and threats of the US and EU elites. Cultural exchanges can only take place when Russia is assured their performers won’t be attacked or museum pieces aren’t illegally confiscated. Russia will keep modernizing its armed forces to repel any aggressor and prevent the possibility of invasion from the west as has happened throughout Russia history with the loss of lives in the many millions and damages in the trillions or more none of which were compensated. President Trump will have a small window of opportunity to improve relations with Russia but the congress seems hell bent to destroy this possibility. If so the game is afoot and Russia will need to map out a radically different course for it s own security, safety and prosperity one that fits its needs and makes the schism with the west permanent.