Dear friends,
This morning you might have noticed that there are a few changes on the blog’s layout. Let me explain what we have done so far.
First, to make it easier for visitors to get to what I personally wrote, we have re-designed the former “Analyses” section into “Saker Analyses”. From now on, everything I write will be posted in this section which will only include my own analyses. The purpose here is to make it easier for visitors to immediately see what I wrote.
Second, we have doubled the size of the “Guest Posts” section. There are a few reasons for that. First, I was getting so many submissions that I often had to tell authors “okay, I would like to post your article, my next opening is Tuesday next week” or something to that effect. Now I can post up to TWO guest contributions each day. Furthermore, on the right hand side of the two latest guest posts we will now have seven smaller boxes which will make it possible to keep guest contributions visible for much longer (before that, some guest posts “disappeared” in just a couple of days “pushed back” by newer articles). The purpose here is to give a much longer (and better) exposure to the many world-class article written by guest posters.
Third, we have now given an extra visibility (special background) to the “Saker Analyses” and “Guest Posts” section. Here, again, the reason is straightforward: these two section represent the ‘core’ of the blog as they are constituted exclusively of original materials. This is one of the biggest difference between the Saker Blog and most other blogs/websites dealing with Russia or resistance to empire: they are mostly news aggregators who either simply reprint stuff written elsewhere or, alternatively, they translate articles written in Russian. We also do that, of course, but such news aggregation functions are labeled as “War News” or “Watch list” or “Speeches and Statements”. There is nothing wrong with that and news aggregation is important. But the core of the Saker blog is original analytical material. And that is what we wanted to show.
These are minor changes, and we are still working on the reorganization of some sections of the blog (really a rationalization) but we won’t be making any massive changes. We feel that even though the blog has grown in a rather chaotic and unplanned way, it became what it is today in a natural, organic, way and that we should not mess too much with what works (if it ain’t broke – don’t fix it!).
Please let us know what you think of these changes.
Hugs and cheers,
The Saker
Marvelous! Nothing but good ideas! Thanks a lot.
Coo stuff and great step forward!
Keep up the great work
One smal request If I may, is it possible to display to picture displayed in each article when sharing on FB or eslewhere?
Regards
Fabien
Excellent ideas. Good Luck Saker.
“the core of the Saker blog is original analytical material.”
This is what makes your blog, the best, mate. Articles from people who know their stuff well and, present it well, are the meat and three veggies of my daily diet; now you want to add some cake and cream too! I am all for it!
OK, I have bookmarked this link:
http://thesaker.is/latest-articles/
At that link all articles are presented in chronological order (most recent at the top).
This is the page that I prefer to open.
Will Saker analyses continue to appear at that link?
Or will they only appear in another area of the blog?
Thanks.
Katherine
There is now a drop shadow on the post tags and the “reply” button after every comment, at least on my (Mac Chrome) computer. It looks very strange…
The intent of the design is good, glad for your work!
I do have a request: keep posted items listed, in the lower section of the site, even after they’ve come down.
Example: yesterday, I think it was, there was an item about Dr. Finkelstein. I did not read it right away, for lack of time. When I accessed the site today to read the item, it was gone. And it had not merely been moved to the lower part of the page where older articles get moved. Fortunately, Paul Roberts had an item up about it, and he keeps his items up for days, so I went there, got Finkelstein’s name, came back here, did a search for the posting, and read the item.
I can understand stuff stays at the top of the page only for a day or so, and then has to be bumped to make room for other stuff. However, if it’s up for only a day, and then completely disappears, there are those who won’t ever know that it had even been posted at all.
So, please keep stuff available on the main page for at least two days, preferably three, in the subordinate section. (And for that matter, please consider adding something similar to what PCR has, with a column listing postings within, say, the last 30 days, for those who’d—for whatever reason—not been able to check in here for two or three days in a row.)
If you open to this page, http://thesaker.is/latest-articles/, all the articles are presented chronoloigcally, most recent first, and articles stay on the page for at least a day or so. And then you can go to the next page and they are still all listed in order that they came in.
Katherine.
Katherine–
Thank you. My apology for my ignorance! :-)
I like, thank you very much.
Suggestion: In threads with many comments, make it easier for returning readers to determine which of them are new. (Perhaps the blog can show the new comments in a different color.) At the moment, I basically read all the comments again whenever I come back, and that can be tiring when there are 200 of them.
Also….when submitting a comment…the message ” you have submitted ” is now at top of the comments so you have to scroll back down to where you were….
All good moves.!
What about a linking function for all commentators.? It would give that vital part of your blog a lift I think.
The reply drop shadow is distracting and suggest a 50% reduction if possible, and see what it looks like then.
Saker, regarding your site, how about a special section for having Russian language lessons? Obviously, without sound it wouldn’t be as good, but it would still be worthwhile.
OK, you mentioned three changes.
Regarding #1, that sounds great! Just make sure you change the heading for this section. Right now, at saker.is, it says, “This section contains analyses and commentaries from the Saker, and others, on various important issues.” Cut out “and others.”
It’s good for there to be clarity on the authorship of the articles. I wish Scott would sign his articles … When he doesn’t, that’s confusing.
Regarding #2, that’s sensible.
Regarding #3, if you’re referring to the drop shadow, I prefer the old format. This new style is jarring.
Finally, please make sure to be careful about filing and tagging posts … For instance, Scott’s latest “Made in Russia” report (VIII) is not filed under “Scott’s Corner.”