Leave a Reply --Link to Moderation Policy--
Only Logged in users can comment.
New Commentators Register here to comment.
Saker Message:
Only Logged in users can comment.
New Commentators Register here to comment.
Sums up the ZPC/NWO quite well.
@ BOT TAk,
I’ll be damned. I just open up my browser to ask if anyone has seen you…, and there you are :o)
At first I really had to laugh at that picture, until I realized how many people have shed their blood for real… That’s a lot less to laugh about.
The picture is a plain message.
The very meaning is in the last lines of article.
If there would be no criminals/oligarchs and their puppets (politicians) there would be much better situation and even no war probably.
The USA than had nothing to threathen or blackmail the elite of Kiev hiding their filthy money around the world (also having in mind the NSA tapes).
I wonder why Kremlin does not apply that kind of simple and effective control of the world… KGB had the guts to do it as the communists had the will to rule the world. Todays liberals in power of Russia just want to be friends with west and dream of equal and fair treatment… in vain.
“Todays liberals in power of Russia just want to be friends with west and dream of equal and fair treatment… in vain.”
Not so, those with power in Russia don’t dream of equal treatment – they already have it. They are the same as the other fascist oligarch bas***ds the world over.
…here is the original article http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2251679.html#comments
which surely is worth of translating and posting here…
This picture represents also this message “We can do what we want”…….
unfortunately, but the time of these gangsters is shrinking, slowly, but surely
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzMLDw_ecqo
Hi Anon…I watched some of your link, but got bored….the Illuminati…another name for the Jesuits.
The Masons also are secret societies…both….
But we will prevail.
@ Anonymous on June 25, 2015 · at 5:01 am UTC
Thank you Anon…..very ominous ….Find David Saoirse’s channel very interesting.
Not boring at all
Best
Christine
A very sad report has come from Novorossia. Brave,young Andre (18) has been killed fighting with the NAF. I remember his story from a while back.He was one of the teenagers from Lisichansk ,the city seized by the fascists in occupied Donetsk.Most of his fellows were killed fighting the fascists.He was awarded a medal for his service.Now he too has fallen for his people,rest in peace young hero.
http://fortruss.blogspot.com/2015/06/18-year-old-novorossia-hero-maloy-kid.html
I posted here about this battaliion and its feat:
The battalion of teenagers from Lugansk
.
We present a story about a young battalion. The battalion was formed in Lugansk region. It consists of youth aged 16 to 18, who are fighting the Ukrainian army. They were guys who could not go to the militia (under 18 years), but wanted to protect his hometown. They got 72 volunteers, of whom 24 were girls. In the last battles Lugansk, unfortunately, many have died, leaving only 54 fighters …
The courage and heroism the battalion showed more than once. When the Ukrainian army was near Lisichanskiy with the battalion “Ghost” the city was under the control of the 72 adolescents with a population of 2000 people … the National Guard could not take the city, using everything he had, mortars , howitzers, with the idea of taking the city in just two hours. The battalion was able to keep the city under control those two days with the hope that it would help to Lugansk …
The teenagers were armed with AK, TT pistols and sniper rifles SVD 2. They were able to eliminate in two days several dozen of Kiev guards and infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers and rocket launchers “Grad”. They fought to the death, with machine guns against tanks … And when they realized that reinforcements could not reach, they began to retreat to Alchevsk. During the retreat rockets “Grad” fell over them, 18 young people were killed
…
http://www.elespiadigital.com/index.php/noticias/defensa/6721-los-otros-heroes-de-nueva-rusia
Every event, every detail, every death, from the beginning, told me that this war is not only of good versus evil, but of absolute beauty against the darkest monstrosity. The most beautiful between us are those fighting there. Because there may be more beauty than giving one’s life for others with 18 years?
In tribute of these brave angels:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZVUuq0Birc
I found it quite fitting and a tribute to youth fighters,that Fort Russ has also posted for it’s,movie of the week, “Ivan’s Childhood” by the great Andrei Tarkovsky.If you haven’t watched it before,check it out at the link below.
http://fortruss.blogspot.com.ar/2015/06/movie-of-week-ivans-childhood.html
@UncleBob
Makes me very sad. May he RIP…:(
Christine
Why hasn’t this lowlife been awarded a Peace Prize already?
Hasn’t butchered enough women and children yet. Some more and the Peace Prize is in the pocket.
A picture says a thousand words……..
If that’s bloody Poroshenko, then this is peaceful Poroshenko :)
http://imgur.com/JNmH1LF
There are a couple of interesting (at least to me) points I’d like to discuss.
First,one of the ways the West influences popular opinion Worldwide.Is not only lies and propaganda.But the way they frame the lies and propaganda.Has anyone ever seen a story or quote from Western officials,about the war in Ukraine.That doesn’t say when mentioning the NAF or DPR/LPR. Terms like “pro-Russian forces,Russian backed forces,pro-Russian rebels,Russian backed self-proclaimed republics”.Somewhere in their articles or statements you will see or hear “pro-Russian or Russian backed”,without a doubt.Now, to we here,and others that pay attention we know its BS.But most people in the World are influenced by those terms.Probably most don’t have to time to read,or much knowledge of the subject.They just glance over the articles or even just check the headlines.And when they see those terms it negatively affects their opinions of Russia.So my question is, why does Russia not retaliate against that.Whenever mentioning the junta or the UAF or volunteer bands.Use the labels “pro-American junta forces,US backed forces,the pro-American junta regime,etc,etc. The power of the “use” of words is strong in propaganda.Does Russia not understand they lose public opinion by letting their enemies frame the spin.
Second,the MH 17 disaster really does confuse me.To start,I’m not asking the questions of who did it,how they did it,or why they did it.My confusion is different.The “conventional wisdom” is that the US and Russia both know the answers to those questions.But if so,why aren’t they saying.I know if the junta did it the US would try to hide it.But why would Russia hide it.It’s not doing Russia any good with sanctions or the West stopping the attacks on Russia.So why not expose the whole truth.And on the other hand.If the NAF did it,why is the US hiding that information.It would seem they would want to expose it as a way to attack Russia even more.Now,the US has covered their “a$$” by saying they don’t have any proof recorded.So that seems to point at the junta.But then we have Russia.Why,if she has any proof would she hide it.That would seem to point at our side.If Russia really does have any proof.So I’m wondering if maybe (for whatever reason) neither side really does have proof.Some on our side would say “Russia is waiting for the right time to expose the truth”.But that begs the question,if true,won’t that make them seem to have been hiding the truth from all the victims families all this time.And that can’t be a good idea from a propaganda stand point to appear as “cruel and callus”.
Yes, my conclusion is that the Russians did not have concrete proofs on the MH17. That would suggest the Russians really need much better satellites, as it’s is very close to their border….
Alan
since you don’t possess the facts, why indicated your weak conclusion?
Russia has all the proof. They know how to hold their cards.
Putin is a clever poker player. Timing is crucial.
He could be “blackmailing” the US to show their own evidence, which he knows they have, and the content of which he knows.
Whose neighborhood is it?
Which jet shut down whose destroyer’s electronics?
Never underestimate, especially when you have zero evidence or facts.
Russia has theUkie tower communications, the radar and the satellite coverage.
By the way, what makes you think everything American is superior?
Technology secrets are about good for 60 days head start in this world.
Sensors in satellites and the algorithms used to extrapolate imagery are decades old.
Nothing special in lenses for many decades.
So what does the US have?
It’s all surface imagery not subterranean or subsea using LIDAR sensing.
Or must you just put down Russia?
@signalman
Very well described and you get the point, Russia doesn’t need to have another 9/11, patience will bring the exact result
God’s mill is working slowly ,but surely
This is silly, never did I say any where in my post that US is superior. As Uncle Bob alluded, it’s very likely Russia imply did not have the satellite “proof”, otherwise they would have shown it. They did show that there was an Su-25 or Su-27 not too far from the MH17 at one point. But it seems the MSM (+ 90% of world stupid populace) did not seem to take it seriously.
As for “waiting for the right time” type argument, I have heard it for so long, it no longer make any sense to me.
Of course, there is also the interview of the Ukraine person who defected and even said who shot MH17 down (Ukrainian pilot), but again, other that RT and “alternative” websites like this, 90+ % of the world’s stupid population dont seem to take it seriously as well. So if there are other more concrete proofs, you need to show it. There is no such thing as waiting for the right time. Right time has been here all along.
If Russia has all the proof, it must not expose it now. It must let the official investigation run its course. The investigation, if it was fair, should collect all evidence, including from Russia. If and when the official investigation publish their results, and if it turns out the conclusions are BS, THEN Russia must come out.
This would have the greatest impact for exposing the western democracies such as Holland for what they really are.
A part that is missing from the BUK /MH17 evidence on both sides, is the launchers radar.
Kerry stated several days after the shootdown that US had detected a SAM missile launch. It stands to reason that they would also have detected the radar emissions from the launcher.
In the Russian Mod presentation they had the positions of the Uki system radars but not a launcher radar?
I tend to think MH17 was shot down by a BUK missile, that the US did detect the launch, but found they could not make their evidence public as the actual position compromised their narrative.
The launcher radar I do not know much about. Is it a narrow beam that can only be detected when in its coverage area?
Can the launcher operate without its own radar switched on when in a system?
MH17 has been shut down by army aircrafts, there are witnesses on the ground, look for them on youtube. People have seen at least 3 jets beside the Boing 777 in the air right before the accident, they have heard the shots fired on the big plane.
BUK story is a side track.
Where are the tower records?
Where are the real satelite pictures US Army must have made as Russian military confirmed they had a satelite right above that area in time all this happened?
There were both Uki aircraft and BUK systems in the vicinity. Although there are witnesses that saw the military aircraft nobody witnessed the actual shoot down.
On the evidence available to the public it is a big mistake to rule out either BUK or aircraft.
Partly because of the US narrative and partly from the pictures of the wreckage I think a BUK missile is the most likely.
If it had been shot down air to air then the US narrative in the first few hours would have been Russian fighter aircraft where responsible.
Uncle Bob 1 wrote:
the US and Russia both know the answers to those questions.But if so,why aren’t they saying. Why, if she has any proof would she hide it.
We do have some very official Russian statements on what happened to MH17, including satellite images. Quoting,
Moreover, the statement of a new witness was recently made public.
So I don’t understand why you think that the Russians are hiding anything? What else would you expect?
An official news conference showing all the data and directly naming who did the shoot down would be good (not names of people of course,but naming directly Ukraine).Nothing in their statements have directly said “Ukraine shot it down,and her are the pictures of them doing it”.Since they haven’t done that it makes me wonder,why? Again, I think as I’ve said in the past, if Ukraine did it they had a purpose.If on the other hand our side did,it was a mistaken identity.We would have nothing to gain and everything to lose by shooting it down.The fact that the US claims they have no real evidence makes it seem it was Ukraine that did the shoot down.But since Russia doesn’t name the guilty party.That makes it not so clear cut,its very confusing.
There is no degree of proof sufficient to change the Western media. That’s life. And Russia has many reasons for holding back from providing 95% proof to providing 99% proof. For example, there may be a trial. If you give out too much, the evidence manipulators at places like Langley will be able to spin things a certain way and discredit the real evidence.
A lot of folks want Russia to release proof of things like 9/11. Why should the Kremlin do that? Russia is fighting a war on terror and wants to be able to say that they are just doing what others are doing. Next, it is possible that Russia is highly compromised in 9/11. There are theories that the missile that hit the Pentagram was from the Kursk for example. Not saying that is true, but the world of black ops is dirty, and it wouldn’t be surprising if there were elements of it that powerful folks in Moscow don’t want going out. Besides, there is no way the Russian military is going to release something like photos of the Twin Towers going down. That is an unreasonable demand.
Uncle Bob 1, unfortunately, it isn’t just Western officials that you’ll notice describing DPR-LPR as ‘pro-Russian’ or ‘Russian-backed’. I have noticed a number of otherwise progressive publications that seem addicted to this unfortunate practice as well. I have tried to register cautions and comment whenever possible on this retrograde usage and suggest others do so as well.
It is doubtful Russia has the smoking gun.
For a BUK shoot down they would need something like heat trace imaging of the missile launch.
Do they have the capability and if so was the satellite in place at the time?
For air to air they have a witness statement of a plane returning without missiles and the pilot stating the plane was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
This would probably need to be backed up by interrogation of the pilot and documentation of the flight.
Russia may very well know what happened, but without clear cut evidence that would stand up in a court.
I think the picture is too generous for a fat bast*rd like Potroshenko. I feel sorry for the body stand-in guy whose body is porotshenko’s head is Photoshopped onto (what an insult!).
Now take the image of fat bast*rd from the Austin Powers movie during his nude scene with a female CIA prostitute and attached parashenko’s head and now you’re talking.
“Ukro Nazis” against “Novo-Russki Bolshies”. This blog has become a propaganda freak show.
@Ann
Trolls has a meeting on another blogs, not here, you are missing your road to the future. We are all of us here peaceful people and hoping for peace around the world.
Your category is missing the point of life.
Enjoy the life, because better times are coming even you like it or not, world is in much stronger number with the peaceful humans.
Nice photo.
Now where’s the eye bleach?